DC / SDC rear-pull collets
Also called back-pull or pull-back collets. There is no nut at the front — the collet is drawn backwards into the holder body by a screw from the rear. That gives the slimmest nose of any collet system, and it also removes the tolerance that ER users take for granted.
How the rear pull works
An ER collet is pushed forward into a taper by a nut. A DC collet is pulled backwards into a matching taper inside the holder by a draw screw that threads into the back of the collet. Because nothing has to fit around the outside of the nose, the front of the holder can be made very slim — which is the whole reason these exist on drilling and tapping work in tight spaces.
The trade-off is stiffness of a different kind: the collet is being loaded in tension along its axis rather than squeezed by a ring, so the holding depends entirely on the taper fit and on the torque you apply to that screw.
Small series — DC4 to DC12
| Size | Body Ø D (mm) | Length L (mm) | Rear thread (single source) | Bore sizes commonly stocked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC4 / SDC4 | 7 | 31 | M4 | 2, 3, 3.175, 4 |
| DC6 / SDC6 | 9.6 | 36 | M5 | 3, 3.175, 4, 5, 6 |
| DC8 / SDC8 | 15 | 45 | M6 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 |
| DC10 / SDC10 | 19 | 52 | — | 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 |
| DC12 / SDC12 | 22 | 60 | M8 | 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 |
Large series — SDC16 to SDC32
| Size | Body Ø (mm) | Length (mm) | Clamping range (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDC16 | 28 | 50 | 3 – 16 |
| SDC20 | 32 | 55 | 4 – 20 |
| SDC25 | 40 | 65 | 6 – 25 |
| SDC32 | 50 | 80 | 10 – 32 |
There is no collapse range — this is the part that catches people out
Two related rules follow from the same design:
- The tool must be inserted past the effective clamping length inside the bore. Makers publish this length per bore — it grows with the bore size — and a shallow insertion feels tight on the bench and pulls out in the cut.
- Use a torque wrench and do not exceed the recommended value by more than about 30%. One maker warns explicitly that over-tightening can deform the holder itself. The torque wrench is usually a separate purchase.
DC compared with ER and C
| DC / SDC (rear pull) | ER | C power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retained by | Rear draw screw | Front nut | Front nut |
| Nut at the nose | No | Yes | Yes |
| Nose clearance | Best of the three | Moderate | Poor |
| Collapse range | None | ≈1 mm | Effectively none |
| Bore matching | Exact | Tolerant | Exact |
| Torque control | Required | Hand-tight | Hand-tight |
| Stated runout | ≤0.005 mm (0.003 mm claimed by one maker) | Class-dependent | Not usually stated |
| Typical work | Drilling, tapping, tight-clearance milling | General purpose | Heavy roughing |
Makers describe the rear-pull angle as giving a stronger grip and better repeat accuracy than a front nut, and several quote repeat clamping accuracy of 0.005 mm or better. Those are maker claims on their own holders; we found no independent standard that defines accuracy classes for DC collets the way DIN 6499 does for ER.
Where DC earns its keep
- Drilling and tapping in dense setups, where a nut simply will not go — this is the main reason shops adopt it
- CNC machining centres and special-purpose machines with tight tool envelopes
- High-repeat work where the same bore is used all day and the exact-match requirement costs nothing
If you change diameters constantly, DC is the wrong system: you will own a collet per size and you will tighten each one with a wrench. ER is the better buy for mixed work, and C power is the answer when the problem is grip rather than clearance. SK and OZ are the other two high-grip families worth comparing before you commit.